Category Archives: Arts & culture

Odds and ends on books and blogs

I’m usually not a big fan of Internet quizzes, but I couldn’t resist “Which science fiction writer are you?” I knew I was going to be Ursula K. LeGuin, and that’s who the quiz said I was. Except of course that I’m not, because I don’t have her talent and skill.

*****

New blog by a religious professional called Open the Doors: The Ministry of Welcome, written by the thoughtful and insightful Chance Hunter. Chance has just become the Welcome Ministry Coordinator at the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Atlanta, Georgia. I’m looking forward to hearing about his thoughts and experiences in congregational hospitality and growth in a program/corporate size congregation.

*****

I miss going to the Seminary Coop Bookstore in Chicago, which remains for my money the best academic bookstore in the United States — at least for the topics I’m interested in: religion, ecology, philosophy, cultural criticism. Today I discovered to my delight that their Web site now allows you to browse The Front Table, the books they currently stock on the famous front table of their 59th St. store — there’s always one or two books on that front table that I decide to buy.

****

Will Shetterly, the Unitarian Universalist and science fiction writer who writes the blog “It’s All One Thing,” has recently stopped eating meat as part of his Three Steps To Save the World. Since that first post, he’s done a number of other posts on vegetarianism and veganism (link, link, and most recently link). He’s convinced me — this week I went back to being a vegetarian. I still eat eggs and butter, and I’m willing to eat small amounts of locally-raised organic meat, but today’s meat and fishing industries are way too polluting and non-sustainable.

Grolier Book Shop

Yesterday, I had to go up to Cambridge for a meeting. While I was up there, I stopped in at a couple of bookstores in Harvard Square, and on a whim I walked over to see if Grolier Poetry Book Shop was still open.

Grolier Poetry Book Shop is one of the last holdovers from a different era. Twenty years ago, there were more than fifty small independent bookstores in and around Harvard Square. Many of those were specialty bookstores, like Mandrake Books that sold only philosophy and fine arts books, or the store on Arrow Street that sold only Asian books, or Grolier that sold only poetry books.

Grolier was special even in those days — it was perhaps the only bookstores in the whole country that sold nothing but poetry. The only other poetry bookstore I knew of was City Lights in San Francisco, but City Lights sold non-poetry books, and most of its poetry had some relation to the Beats. Grolier carried all kinds of poetry. Everyone who cared about poetry went there: people would travel great distances to go to Grolier; walk in there on any given day, and you would be likely to run into a published poet, or at least a young struggling poet.

The last time I was in Grolier was a year ago. Louisa, the former owner, had not been well for quite some time. Store hours had grown irregular, so when I walked by last spring and saw she was open, I went in. Louisa looked ill, the shelves were half-empty, and for the first time ever I walked out of the store without finding at least one book of poetry to buy.

So yesterday, I walked by on a whim; more out of habit than anything else. Miracle of miracles, Grolier was open. Not only that, but the shelves were full again. I climbed up the familiar steep stone steps and walked in.

“Where should I leave my pack?” I asked out of reflex (Louisa vigorously enforced the rule that all bags and packs should be left behind the counter).

“Over there, if you want to,” said the pleasant, relaxed man at the counter, someone whom I had never seen before.

We wound up talking at some length. Daniel is the new general manager of the store; he’s managing it for the owner; sales have been pretty good so far; he’s a professional musician, a trumpeter, who’s taking a break from performing. We both agreed on several things: the level of music education in the general population is declining; we wish Barney Frank was one of our senators rather than in the House of Representatives; Philadelphia is a wonderful city; the war in Iraq is absolutely insane.

Daniel apologized that he did not have the bilingual edition of Portuguese poetry that I was looking for, tacitly acknowledged that in the old days Grolier probably would have had it, and said that it was taking time to build up the stock to the old levels. I managed to find the other books I was looking for, and a few others I wasn’t looking for: Countee Cullen’s collection of African American poetry, a collection of poems by contemporary Chinese poets, the collected poems of Maya Angelou, Given by Wendell Berry, and Audre Lourde’s The Marvelous Arithmetics of Distance.

What a relief: Once again, I’ll be able to make regular trips to Grolier to get my poetry fix. Once again, a cultural landmark is open for business.

Grolier Poetry Book Shop: Daniel Wuenschel, General Manager. 6 Plympton Street, near Harvard Square, Cambridge (off Mass. Ave. behind the Harvard Book Store). Phone: 617-547-4648, email: grolierpoetry AT verizon DOT net.

Grolier’s hours:
Tuesday and Wednesday, 11 am to 7 pm;
Thursday – Saturday, 11 am to 6 pm,
closed Sunday and Monday.

What makes a good religious blog?

Recently, I’ve been thinking about writing some critical reviews of other religious blogs. But what makes for a good religious blog? Below, I’ve listed some of the criteria I use for judging religious blogs (of course, no one blog will meet all these criteria).

I’d love to know what criteria you use to judge the quality of religious blogs, or of blogs in general — leave your criteria in the comments.

  1. Good writing
    • Well-crafted prose or verse
    • Distinctive voice
    • Aimed at a recognizable audience
    • Worthy subject matter [added per Jess’s suggestion in comments]
  2. Good blogging practices
    • Posts that appear with some regularity (daily, three times a week, weekly; but at least weekly)
    • Comments enabled and responded to; nasty comments and comment spam removed in a timely fashion
    • Posts corrected and/or updated as needed
    • Adherence to some style book, including consistent style for hyperlinks
    • Social networking in the form of some connection to other blogs
  3. Significant content about the faith tradition, including for example (examples are for my faith tradition):
    • Exploration of the distinctively Unitarian and Universalist theological traditions, and/or
    • Exploration of the Unitarian and Universalist historical traditions, and/or
    • A willingness to engage in defining boundaries of the tradition, and/or
    • Serious, frank, thoughtful discussion of contemporary issues facing Unitarian Universalism
  4. A focus on lived religion, including for example:
    • Reflections on what it means to live life as a Unitarian Universalist (or insert other religious tradition), and/or
    • Connecting events from everyday life with spiritual or religious concerns (at least sometimes), and/or
    • Discussions of politics and social action, if discussed from a religious perspective, and with a clear distinction made between, e.g., liberal religion and liberal politics
  5. An openness to those from other faith traditions
    • A majority of the writing is not aimed at “insiders”
    • All acronyms explained in every post; technical language explained frequently
    • Significant religious content or discussion that is not specific to the faith tradition

I’m not qualified

The annual Unitarian Universalist blog awards process has begun again. I do not plan to nominate or vote. There are something like 200 Unitarian Universalist blogs, but I can only seem to keep up with two or three them on a regular basis. So I don’t feel qualified to say which is the year’s best blog, or which is the year’s best blog entry.

Sometimes I feel guilty that I don’t read lots of Unitarian Universalist blogs. But I like to read blogs written from other religious perspectives, like the blog entries aggregated at The Daily Scribe, with authors who write from Jewish, pagan, progressive Christian, Emergent Christian, humanist, and Buddhist perspectives. That kind of thing broadens my mind, and my mind could use some broadening.

And I am just as likely to read non-religious blogs: my two sisters’ blogs (Jean, Abby); the Horn Books Magazine blog Read Roger; and maybe Boing Boing and Bad Astronomy. Then there are the many newspapers, magazines, books, and the reading matter I get from Carol. Sitting on the dining room table waiting for me right now are: The Small-Mart Revolution (from Carol), The Shorebird Guide, rattapallax 13, Asimov’s science fiction magazine, The Post-Corporate World (also from Carol), Boswell’s Life of Johnson, a book on religions of the African diaspora, and Harvard Business Review.

Not that I’ll get around to reading everything on that list. But I never wanted to be a specialist, and I can only do so much specialized reading. The pre-Socratic philosopher Heraclitus said, “Those who love wisdom must be inquirers into very many things indeed.” Not that I’d count myself wise, but I’m certainly not qualified to judge Unitarian Universalist blogs.

Update: An attempt at defining a set of criteria for what constitutes a “good religious blog” here.

“You’ve got to sit down”…

From the November, 2006, issue of Working Waterfront/ Inter-Island News, a publication based in Maine:

Vegetable fleet puts to sea

Here in mid-coast Maine, adventurous farmer-sailors grow Giant Atlantic Pumpkins, only to slice them in half, hollow them out, and put to sea in their veggie coracles. A recent pumpkin regatta in Damariscotta attracted scads of spectators.

Not your garden-variety pumpkins, these gargantuan squashes can tip the scales at a whopping 1,000 pounds or even more, but of course this is before they are converted to low-freeboard boats with decks and outboard motors….

Link to story and photos at the online version of Working Waterfront News.

You can learn more about how to grow, build, and sail your own pumpkin boat from a Bangor Daily News article:

“Commodore” Buzz Pinkham, owner of Pinkham’s Plantation Greenhouse and Landscape Center on Biscay Road, made his first pumpkin boat last fall…. “I was the first captain,” Pinkham recalled of his maiden voyage. “You definitely want to stay on center. You do not want to get out of line too much. We kind of went low-profile last year because we didn’t know if it would sink or tip upside down.”…

On Sunday [October 8, 2006], Tom Lishness of Windsor and Bill Clark of Bristol were hard at work crafting boats out of giant pumpkins. It’s a pretty simple job. First they cut and hollow out a 2-foot-by-2-foot “cabin” and then attach a plywood “deck” to the pumpkin with 8-inch bolts. On Monday the group plans to outfit their boats with 2 to 9 horsepower outboard motors. The only other additions are gas tanks and sand bags for ballast. Clark fashioned his boat from an 812-pound orange pumpkin. Lishness crafted “Moby Gourd” from a 712-pound white pumpkin.

“You’ve got to sit down,” Commodore Pinkham advised his sailors. “I don’t know if it’s really advisable to stand in it.”

Link to full article.

The Damariscotta event pales in comparison with established pumpkin regattas like the ones in Windsor, Nova Scotia [link], Nekoosa, Wisconsin, and Tualatin, Oregon [link], which can have dozens of competitors in several classes such as paddle-powered pumpkins, motor-pumpkins, and experimental craft.

I figured I’d tell you about this now so you can plan next year’s garden accordingly.

Brainstorming Church 2.0

Tonight, Peter Bowden and I went in to Boston to check out the Emergent Church service in downtown Boston (more about that in a later post). On the way back, we stopped in at Diesel Cafe in Davis Square to have a cup of coffee and talk about how we could radically rebuild Unitarian Universalist congregations.

“You’ve heard of Web 2.0?” I said. Web 2.0 is a vague term which includes things like social networking Web sites, blogs, YouTube, wikis, and so on. “Well, I want to do Church 2.0.”

Peter liked that term. “Yeah, if we even say ‘Church 2.0’ that immediately implies that all other ways of doing church are just a little bit outdated.”

So then we started brainstorming what Church 2.0 might be like.

First principle is simple: Church 2.0 is relational. It depends on building decentralized connections between people. But Church 2.0 uses a variety of modalities to build connections between people, and not just traditional Church 1.0 modalities such as Sunday morning worship services and committee meetings. It also uses new technologies to help people connect, including:

  • Streamed videocasts of worship services (for shut-ins and people who just couldn’t/wouldn’t come to church that week)
  • Podcasts of sermons you can listen to on your commute
  • Minister’s blog(s), and blogs by other religious professionals: DREs, musicians, etc. — where you can exchange ideas and comments with church staff
  • Other blogs?
  • A wiki for lay leaders, to facilitate transparent and accessible governance
  • Regular email delivered by a service like “Constant Contact,” so you can customize the kinds of email you want to get from the church
  • Maybe some kind of social networking site?
  • What else?

Not everyone is going to have good Web access (although Church 2.0 will have computers with Internet access available during social hour), and not everyone is going to want to use all the different modalities. That’s fine. The real point is that Church 2.0 doesn’t exist in just one modality — it’s not just Sunday morning worship and social hour, delivered to a relatively passive congregation by a small group of lay and professional leaders. Church 2.0 exists in a decentralized web of interactions. And the different modalities each deliver slightly different content. For example…

  • Regular Sunday morning worship with a sermon
  • Podcast with recorded sermon, reading, and one or two pieces of music from Sunday morning
  • Midweek video reflection with that week’s worship leader, a self-contained reflection that also leads in to the week’s worship service
  • Email version of the “Wayside Pulpit” delivers a quote to your email address each week, which relates to the upcoming sermon topic
  • An online sermon discussion group (forum or moderated email list)
  • Discussion group during social hour to help the preacher plan the next week’s worship service

…all of which relate to Sunday morning worship, but each of which addresses the topic of Sunday morning worship slightly differently.

We also brainstormed a little on how Church 2.0 will help congregations meet the needs of church members after peak oil. The Web site of Church 2.0 would have a map of the surrounding region, showing where church members live (click to send email, though you don’t see the email address), and where regional small groups meet (click to get contact info).

That’s about as far as our brainstorming got. Some of the ideas we came up with are crazy or impractical, no doubt about it. Some are just stupid. At this point, we’re just brainstorming. But both of us feel pretty strongly that we need to be looking at radical change in the way we do church — and that we don’t have much time to make that change happen.

Participate in the Church 2.0 discussion on the Church 2.0 wiki!

Generational differences?

Carol and I took a walk this afternoon, and while we were walking we each complained about two different organizations we belong to:– call them the Hippie Organization and the Staid Organization.

“They’re just not focussed on their mission,” said Carol of the Hippie Organization, to which she belongs. “They’re spending thousands of dollars on [name of program deleted], but they’re requiring that their big annual conference make a profit. It should be the other way around, they should subsidize their conference because it’s better at promoting their mission.”

“I know the feeling,” I said. I told her how the Staid Organization, to which I belong, has had a mission statement that sets very low expectations, asking very little of its members. “I give them credit for working on a new mission statement this year, although it’s not guaranteed that anyone will do anything differently once the new mission statement is in place. But something’s got to change.”

We traded stories back and forth about how we’re plotting to change these two organizations from the inside. Finally, Carol said, “I’m tired of all these middle aged men who don’t do anything.” (I’m a middle-aged man, but I didn’t take offense because I knew just what she meant.) “I feel like the Baby Boomers, people who are older than us but younger than my parents, are stuck in their ways. I think there’s a generational difference.” Carol belongs to Generation X.

“You know, I hadn’t thought about that, but — yeah,” I said. I told her that most of the people in Staid Organization are older than I am, and are Baby Boomers. “Technically, I’m a Baby Boomer, too,” I continued, “but I’m barely a Boomer. It seems like the Boomers who lived through the 60’s got really good at criticizing and tearing down institutions, but they’re not so good at institutional maintenance and direction.”

“Although if you really look at the Baby Boom generation,” Carol said, “only about nine percent of them actually were involved in the counter-culture, and the rest were just like Tricia Nixon. But now all the Boomers are proud of the whole 60’s rebellion thing. I’m just not interested in that:– ‘protest, protest, protest!’ It doesn’t really get anywhere.”

We also talked about when it’s time to cut our losses, and resign from the organizations. I’m giving Staid Organization another six months; Carol is giving Hippie Organization another two months. We each have limited time and energy, and don’t want to waste it on organizations that don’t seem to be going anywhere.

Is the generational difference between the Boomers and the younger generations really significant from the point of view of institutional life? It may well be true that Boomers are more intrested in being rebels and less interested in being good institutionalists — not each and every Boomer, but the generation considered on average. And it may be true that Boomers are more likely to have a modernist mindset and less likely to be postmodern systems thinkers — it seems that each succeeding generation contains a few more systems thinkers. (Research on generational cohorts seems to support these two views to a certain extent.) But do these generational differences actually affect the flesh-and-blood people in your congregation?

So now I’d love to hear how my readers perceive generational differences in congregations (or other institutions and organizations)….

If you respond, please say which generation you were born into, based on Strauss and Howe’s generational divisions in their book Generations [summary]:– G.I. Generation (born 1901-1924); Silent Generation (1925-1942); Baby Boomer (1943-1960); 13th Generation, a.k.a. Generation X (1961-c.1981); Millennial Generation (after 1981).

No More NaNoWriMo

National Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo) officially ended yesterday. I had signed up, and I got nearly 19,000 words written, out of a goal of 50,000 total words. Then work intervened — an unexpected memorial service, craziness in the office, too much to do generally. I’d come home, and all I wanted was to sit and do nothing. Writing a novel involved too much mental effort. So I stopped.

My older sister, Jean, had warned me:– November is a bad month in which to try NaNoWriMo. She did it in July. Maybe I’ll try again come July….

This past week, work slowed down enough that I actually had energy to engage in mental effort when I came home. But instead of resuming work on the abandoned novel, I found myself picking up an old book project that I had gotten stuck on about three years ago, and had filed away. I’m not going to say any more about this project, except to say that I finally seem to be getting somewhere with it.

Anti-science, grr…

One of the key aspects of Mr. Crankypants’s religion is that his religion is compatible with science. Call him pro-science and pro-religious — in fact, Mr. Crankypants would be proud if you called him pro-science.

Politics is not usually a topic for this blog, but there is little doubt that the current administration in Washington is anti-science. Mr. Crankypants likes to read “Bad Astronomy,” a blog written by an astronomer named Phil Plait who writes periodically about what he has come to call White House tampering of science. For example, Mr. Plait has written on White House attempts to legislate against evolution, and about how the White House distorts the science around global warming. Recently Plait wrote about how the White House has managed to slash NASA’s budget, despite what Congress had budgeted for NASA. Why slash NASA’s budget? –follow the link to the article by James Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and you’ll discover that the White House doesn’t like the fact that some of NASA’s research has been providing additional confirmation to the fact of global warming.

Hansen’s article includes a great quote by Richard Feynman:

The only way to have real success in science… is to describe the evidence very carefully without regard to the way you feel it should be.

Mr. Crankypants can’t help thinking that at least part of the reason the current inhabitants of the White House are anti-science is due to their self-professed religious viewpoint, that of Christian literalism — a religious viewpoint that dismisses solid science like evolution, atmospheric science, psychology,* and the Big Bang — because the evidence conflicts with the way the White House feels the world should be.

Religion need not be anti-science. Mr. Crankypants’s religion is compatible with science. What about yours?

* Psychology is on the short list, because psychologists have long since determined that homosexuality is not a form of mental illness, i.e., it is not aberrant behavior — a determination which conflicts with the way the White House feels about the world.