Conservative lawyer David French is now writing a column for the New York Times. Yoicks. A conservative writing for the bastion of liberalism in the U.S.?
Well, according to this opinion piece, French had the temerity to stand up for his “commitment to the classical liberal ideal of government as neutral guarantor of free expression and association that the new conservative intellectuals have abandoned.” Beyond that, he got hated on by conservatives in social media when he, a white man, adopted a Black child. It sounds like he kind of got kicked out of the conservative club.
In his first column in the Times, French wrote:
“Any time my tribe or my allies are under fire, before I yield to the temptation of a reflexive defense, I should apply my principles and carefully consider the most uncomfortable of thoughts: My opponents might be right, my allies might be wrong and justice may require that I change my mind. And it may, in all likelihood, require that I do this again and again.”
Presumably French is actually talking about himself. But he might as well be talking about us liberals and progressives and leftists.
You know what, sometimes we’re wrong. I won’t talk about liberals and progressives, but I can talk about my people, the leftists. Before my day, leftists in the 1930s were wrong about Stalin and the Soviet Union; we had to change our minds, which forced us to rethink what we meant by socialism and communism: we had to be reminded by conservatives that totalitarianism is always wrong, even when it masquerades as socialism or communism. In my day, leftists in the 1970s and 1980s veered from freedom of expression into hyperindividualism, and we mocked the conservatives who held on to values of community. We were wrong, and we began to realize individual expression had to be balanced against community. (By the way, this became even more clear when some leftists veered into libertarianism, went to Silicon Valley, and started creating a new kind of totalitarianism.)
And today? Hmm…some leftists are veering away from a commitment to the ideal of government as neutral guarantor of free expression and free association…in other words, some leftists are also veering towards totalitarianism.
We all need to listen to one another, without yielding to the temptation of reflexive defensiveness — liberals and conservatives, progressives and right-wing libertarians, leftists and today’s hyperindividualistic right wingers. We don’t have to agree — but if we listen, we might find we have to clarify our ideas or even change our minds.
Thank you! Well put and essential.
I think a wonderful book on cultivating the virtue of listening to others and engaging in dialogue is “High Conflict”, by journalist Amanda Ripley.
Lots of great stories in that book, and specific suggestions for practices to increase dialogue. One of them is the practice of BEGINNING dialogue by each side of the conflict making sure they can SUMMARIZE the other side’s views in a way that the other side recognizes as accurate.
You cannot persuade someone to modify their perspective in the slightest unless you start out by showing them that you have LISTENED to them, and RESPECTED them.
https://www.amandaripley.com/high-conflict
Tim, thanks for the recommendation. And the last paragraph of your comment is the best advice I’ve yet heard on this topic.
Journalist Parker Molloy suggests that the NY Times response to trans-related current events is just a repeat of how they screwed up covering the beginnings of the Holocaust in the 1930s.
This may be a time for paying attention to these warnings and not repeat the mistakes of the past:
https://www.readtpa.com/p/oh-no-its-happening-again